Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

637 N.E.2d 172

Gullett v. Smith

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 29, 1994

Indiana Court of Appeals · decided 1994-06-29

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 2016

4 state decisions

Relies on Perry v. Stitzer Buick, GMC, Inc.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1994-06-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

GARRARD, Judge,

¶1dissenting.

¶2I respectfully dissent. It is undisputed that at the time of the collision, Smith was on his way to work at his job at United States Steel. That he was given unlimited use of a city owned vehicle and was on twenty-four hour call by the city is not sufficient in my view to create a genuine issue for the fact finder to determine that he was acting in the service of the city at that point in time. See Perry v. Stitzer Buick, GMC, Inc. (1992) Ind.App., 604 N.E.2d 613, 617. I would affirm the summary judgment.

/637/ne2d/172 · .json · Public domain