Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 637 N.W.2d 488 - McElroy v. State

McElroy v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
4
states following
August 2021
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently August 2021

2 federal appellate · 18 state decisions

110200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc. · Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. Vinson · Faragher v. City of Boca Raton · Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc. · Monge v. California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] statement that would ordinarily be deemed hearsay is admissible if it is offered for a non-hearsay purpose that does not depend upon the truth of the facts presented.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “For example, the statement may be offered simply to demonstrate it was made, to explain subsequent actions by the listener, or to show notice to or knowledge of the listener.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “determine if the party's true purpose in offering the evidence was in fact to prove the statement's truth.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.