Harker v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently November 2014
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1385
Relies on Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. v. Republic of Cuba · Cooksey v. State · Gillars v. United States · Oveson v. Municipality of Anchorage · United States v. Wolffs
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“for the benefit of the people as a whole”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Evidence illegally obtained shall not be used over proper objection by the defendant in a criminal prosecution for any purpose except [for certain purposes in perjury prosecutions].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Harker v. State“to remove incentives for governmental intrusion into protected areas,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Harker v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.