637 So. 2d 1012 - State v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
248 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 249 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably 775 So. 2d 1022 - State v. Casey (2000), 719 So. 2d 610 - State v. Owens (1998)
248 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Terry v. Ohio · Neil v. Biggers · Manson v. Brathwaite
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 249 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“does not determine whether another possible hypothesis suggested by a defendant could afford an exculpatory explanation of the events.”
23 later decisions quote this exact passage“A videotape, which is like a photograph, is neither testimony nor written evidence and is not excluded by [ Article 793 ]. A photograph is a reproduction of a physical object or scene. It is not "written" evidence of "testimony" within the meaning of [ Article 793 ], which prohibits the use of written material during deliberations. Hence, a jury's request to see a videotape after it retired to deliberate ... is not an abuse of the court's statutory discretion." See State v. Overton, 337 So.2d 1058 (La. 1976).”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“Purse snatching is the theft of anything of value contained within a purse or wallet at the time of the theft, from the person of another or which is in the immediate control of another, by use of force, intimidation, or by snatching, but not armed with a dangerous weapon.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.