637 So. 2d 102 - State v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
54 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably 851 So. 2d 921 - State v. Tate (2003), 672 So. 2d 116 - State v. Tart (1996)
54 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Starnes v. Penrod Drilling Co. · Moore v. Blackburn, Warden · 622 So. 2d 198 - State v. Bourque · 630 So. 2d 1278 - State v. Robertson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“because the trial judge has the benefit of seeing the facial expressions and hearing the vocal intonations of the members of the jury venire as they respond to questions by the parties' attorneys.”
17 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Eugene · State v. Record“We have repeatedly held that a trial judge is vested with broad discretion in ruling on challenges for cause, and only where it appears, upon review of the voir dire examination as a whole, that the judge's exercise of that discretion has been arbitrary or unreasonable, resulting in prejudice to the accused, will this Court reverse the ruling of a trial judge....”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“(2) The juror is not impartial, whatever the cause of his partiality. An opinion or impression as to the guilt or innocence of the defendant shall not of itself be sufficient ground of challenge to a juror, if he declares, and the court is satisfied, that he can render an impartial verdict according to the law and the evidence; .... (4) The juror will not accept the law as given to him by the court[.]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.