Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 637 So. 2d 1213 - White v. Longanecker

637 So. 2d 1213 - White v. Longanecker’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
states following
April 2016
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently April 2016 · most notably 676 So. 2d 1144 - Augustus v. St. Mary Parish School Bd. (1996), 676 So. 2d 850 - ESTE' v. State Farm Ins. Companies (1996)

28 state decisions

150199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cities of Charlottesville v. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. · 341 So. 2d 332 - Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc. · 373 So. 2d 498 - Reck v. Stevens · 623 So. 2d 1257 - Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp. · 579 So. 2d 429 - American Motorist v. American Rent-All

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he discretion vested in the trier of fact is "great," and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages. Reasonable persons frequently disagree about the measure of general damages in a particular case. It is only when the award is, in either direction, beyond that which a reasonable trier of fact could assess for the effects of the particular injury to the particular plaintiff under the particular circumstances that the appellate court should increase or reduce the award.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.