Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 637 SO2D 1345 - Roberts v. Veazey

Roberts v. Veazey’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 1994
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 575 So. 2d 91 - Ex Parte Eastwood Foods, Inc. · Lámar v. State · 396 So. 2d 699 - J.S. Walton and Co. v. Reeves · 691 So. 2d 518 - State v. Monroe · Gilbreath v. Eastwood Foods, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Initially, the reviewing court will look to see if there is any legal evidence to support the trial court's findings. If such evidence is found, then the reviewing court determines whether any reasonable view of that evidence supports the trial court's judgment."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.