Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 637 So. 2d 3 - Johnson v. State

637 So. 2d 3 - Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
3
states following
October 2011
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently October 2011

8 state decisions

40199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 133 Ill. 2d 540 - Patzner v. Baise · 500 So. 2d 134 - Keys v. State · 547 So. 2d 129 - Roberts v. State · State v. Viramontes · 200 Ill. App. 3d 740 - People v. Algarin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “787.01 Kidnapping; kidnapping of child under age 13, aggravating circumstances. — (1)(a) The term "kidnapping" means forcibly, secretly, or by threat confining, abducting, or imprisoning another person against his will and without lawful authority, with intent to: 1. Hold for ransom or reward or as a shield or hostage. 2. Commit or facilitate commission of any felony. 3. Inflict bodily harm upon or to terrorize the victim or another person. 4. Interfere with the performance of any governmental or political function. (b) Confinement of a child under the age of 13 is against his will within the meaning of this subsection if such confinement is without the consent of his parent or legal guardian.[e.s.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Johnson, 637 So.2d at 4 [e.s.] (citing Annot., Kidnapping or Related Offense by Taking or Removing of Child by or Under Authority of Parent or One in Loco Parentis, 20 A.L.R.4th 823 , 827 (1983)). In other words, under Johnson , one cannot be criminally liable simply for”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “confining ... another person against his will... .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.