Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 637 SO2D 335 - Wilcox v. Stout

Wilcox v. Stout’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
January 2025
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently January 2025

2 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

701994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 539 So. 2d 473 - Florida Bar v. Newhouse · 257 So. 2d 889 - Honchell v. State · 105 So. 2d 164 - Snipes v. West Flagler Kennel Club, Inc. · 214 So. 2d 753 - Farnell v. State · 413 So. 2d 429 - Martinez v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where a civil conspiracy to commit tor-tious acts has been successfully alleged, and some of those acts are alleged to have been accomplished within the state of Florida, we have no hesitancy in applying the well-accepted rules applicable to the liability of co-conspirators in the criminal context. Those rules make every act and declaration of each member of the conspiracy the act and declaration of them all. Additionally, each conspirator is liable for and bound by the act and declaration of each and all of the conspirators done or made in furtherance of the conspiracy even if not present at the time.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Florida recognizes that civil conspiracies may exist as an independent tort.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.