Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 637 SO2D 7 - Romero v. State

Romero v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
June 2016
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently June 2016

8 state decisions

60199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 569 So. 2d 439 - State v. Dist. Ct. of Appeal, First Dist. · 400 So. 2d 956 - Smith v. State · 605 So. 2d 73 - State v. Melahn · 515 So. 2d 1287 - Bourgault v. State · Gonzalez v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “it is the prerogative of the appellate court, not the trial court, to determine whether the appellate court's opinions are inconsistent, and if so, what should be done about it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.