Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 637 So. 2d 741 - State v. Collins

637 So. 2d 741 - State v. Collins’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 2007
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · California v. Hodari D. · 338 So. 2d 584 - State v. Crosby · Logiudice v. Georgia · State v. Mims

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Utilizing the factors listed in Tucker, we find that defendant’s “actual stop” was not imminent at the time he abandoned the evidence. Officer Brown was fifteen feet away during his observation of defendant and did not approach defendant with his weapon drawn. Also, both defendant and the officer were on foot, and the encounter occurred in broad daylight with no one else around, when Officer Brown was the only officer in the area. Under these circumstances, we find that defendant was not in imminent danger of being “actually stopped” by Officer Brown. Therefore, even if Officer Brown initially lacked reasonable suspicion for a stop of defendant, once defendant abandoned the matchbox containing cocaine, reasonable suspicion for the stop of defendant and seizure of the matchbox certainly existed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.