Campbell v. State

Cory CAMPBELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 25, 1994.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1994-05-25

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently April 2003

4 state decisions

Relies on Newman v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1994-05-25

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 *81 Cory Campbell, pro se.

¶2No appearance required for appellee.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4We sua sponte dismiss this appeal from a denial of a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 motion for post conviction relief for lack of jurisdiction. The notice of appeal was filed well past thirty days from the order denying the motion. Appellant's motion for rehearing in the trial court did not postpone rendition of the order on appeal. Newman v. State, 610 So.2d 455 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992) (rule 3.800 does not authorize a motion for rehearing and thus a motion for rehearing does not postpone rendition of the order on appeal). The notice in the instant case was therefore untimely and this court lacks jurisdiction to consider the merits of this appeal.

¶5HERSEY, PARIENTE and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.