637 So. 2d 921 - Vining v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

cited by 41 later decisions

states following

January 2017

most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 39 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently January 2017 · most notably 940 So. 2d 389 - England v. State (2006), 699 So. 2d 1312 - Franqui v. State (1997)

1 federal appellate · 39 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States Accardi v. Shaughnessy · National Union Fire Insurance v. Helfand · Clemons v. Mississippi · Jones v. Howard · Andrijevic v. Kelleran

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“[t]he aggravating factors to be considered in determining the propriety of a death sentence are limited to those set out in [the statute]. Therefore, there is no reason to require the State to notify defendants of the aggravating factors that it intends to prove.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Winkles v. State · Lynch v. State
“ARTICLE III Request for Final Disposition (a) Whenever a person has entered upon a term of imprisonment in a penal or correctional institution of a party state, and whenever during the continuance of the term of imprisonment there is pending in any other party state any untried indictment, information, or complaint on the basis of which a detainer has been lodged against the prisoner, he or she shall be brought to trial within 180 days after the prisoner shall have caused to be delivered to the prosecuting officer and the appropriate court of the prosecuting officer's jurisdiction written notice of the place of his or her imprisonment and the prisoner's request for a final disposition to be made of the indictment, information, or complaint; provided that, for good cause shown in open court, the prisoner or the prisoner's counsel being present, the court having jurisdiction of the matter may grant any necessary or reasonable continuance.... * * * * * * ARTICLE IV Request for Custody or Availability * * * * * * (c) In respect of any proceeding made possible by this article, trial shall be commenced within 120 days of the arrival of the prisoner in the receiving state, but for good cause shown in open court, the prisoner or the prisoner's counsel being present, the court having jurisdiction of the matter may grant any necessary or reasonable continuance.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. 713 So. 2d 1046 - Quinn v. State · 807 So. 2d 790 - State v. Garza
“The scope of voir dire questioning rests in the sound discretion of the court and will not be interfered with unless that discretion is clearly abused.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Jackson v. State · 965 So. 2d 1 - Hoskins v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.