637 So. 2d 989 - Castro v. Sangles’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently January 2013
1 federal appellate · 19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on D'Avanzo v. United States · Local No. 234 of United Ass'n of Journeymen & Apprentices of Plumbing & Pipefitting Industry of United States & Canada v. Henley & Beckwith, Inc. · Stewart v. Stearns & Culver Lumber Co. · 413 So. 2d 772 - Cooper v. Paris · 125 Cal. App. 2d 253 - Marshall v. LaBoi
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) As a matter of public policy, contracts entered into on or after October 1, 1990, by an unlicensed contractor shall be unenforceable in law or in equity by the unlicensed contractor. * ⅜ * (3) This section shall not affect the rights of parties other than the unlicensed contractor to enforce contract, lien, or bond remedies. This section shall not affect the obligations of a surety that has provided a bond on behalf of an unlicensed contractor. It shall not be a defense to any claim on a bond or indemnity agreement that the principal or indemnitor is unlicensed for purposes of this section.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“necessary in the interest of the public health, safety, and welfare to regulate the construction industry”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“clearly in pari delicto since it was he who, for his own financial gain, made a specific representation to official authorities, under oath, that the building permit was expressly sought by the owner as builder thereby disavowing the presence of the “general contractor” [Sangles] against whom he now seeks to enforce an alleged ... agreement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jones v. Phillipson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.