Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 637 S.W.2d 699 - State v. Mansfield

State v. Mansfield’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
2
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably State v. Blankenship (1992), Wiseheart v. State (1986)

32 state decisions

1401982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Kirk · United States v. Guzman · State v. Smothers · State v. Johnson · State Ex Rel. McNary v. Stussie

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The remedy of disallowing the relevant and material testimony of a defense witness essentially deprives the defendant of his right to call witnesses in his defense. This is not to say it should never be done, but it is certainly a drastic remedy that should be used with the utmost caution.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “If at any time during the course of the proceeding it is brought to the attention of the court that a party has failed to comply with an applicable discovery rule or an order issued pursuant thereto, the court may order such party to make disclosure of material and information not previously disclosed, grant a continuance, exclude such evidence, or enter such other orders as it deems just under the circumstances.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.