Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 637 SW2D 790 - Saab v. Saab

Saab v. Saab’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
March 2006
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently March 2006

12 state decisions

60198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In Re Marriage of Vanet · Teefey v. Teefey · State Ex Rel. Stanhope v. Pratt · Chemical Fireproofing Corp. v. Bronska · Frankel v. Moskovitz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is to provide a coercive means to compel the recalcitrant party to comply with relief granted to his adversary, [citation omitted] It is axiomatic that the trial court can exercise its contempt power only to compel the contemnor to comply with those obligations arising from the judgment or decree which the contemnor has in fact failed to perform.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.