Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 638 A.2d 1043 - State v. Brigham

State v. Brigham’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
December 2022
most recently cited

1 district · 25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently December 2022 · most notably State v. Bettencourt (1999), State v. Toole (1994)

1 district · 25 state decisions

1101994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Jalette · State v. Pignolet · State v. Brown · State v. Tobin · State v. Cardoza

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he factors to be considered when comparing the charged incident and the prior sexual misconduct are 'time, place, age, family relationships of the victims, and the form of the sexual acts.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “As a general rule, in the prosecution of a specific crime, evidence of past, unconnected, uncharged criminal behavior is not admissible to prove a defendant's propensity to commit the crime charged. * * * The basis for excluding such evidence of `other crimes' is the belief that `the potential for creating prejudice in the minds of the jurors outweighs its probative value.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “probative of a plan or scheme by defendant to assault his stepdaughters prior to their thirteenth birthdays”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.