Gore v. Gore’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
2 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently September 2014
2 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hecht Co. v. Bowles · 356 Pa. Super. 365 - Wolf v. Wolf · 75 Cal. App. 3d 893 - Klemm v. Superior Court · United States v. Dogan · Mary Osin v. Robert H. Johnson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“No contention has been made before this court that she was not properly joined. She is represented by counsel and she has had an opportunity to be heard in the trial court and in this court as well. Indeed, she was “free to present evidence and [was] afforded the same protections as [if] the claims for resulting trust and unjust enrichment [had] been maintained separately.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Graves v. Graves
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.