Keating v. Martin’s Empirical Analysis
638 F.2d 1121 · 1980
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently February 2007 · most notably Rich v. Dollar (1988), Gray III v. Bell (1983)
13 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Scheuer v. Rhodes · Imbler v. Pachtman · Stump v. Sparkman · Gomez v. Toledo · In the Matter of John Ruffalo Jr
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“so long as the actions complained of appear to be within the scope of prosecutorial duties.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“... is equally available to investigators for the state prosecutor for actions in connection with a criminal prosecution.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lawyer v. Kernodle · Rich v. Dollar
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.