Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 638 F.2d 1357 - Covington Grain Company Inc Collateral Control Corporation v. Deal

Covington Grain Company Inc Collateral Control Corporation v. Deal’s Empirical Analysis

638 F.2d 1357 · 1981

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
1
states following
March 2010
most recently cited

25 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently March 2010 · most notably Growth Realty Companies v. Regency Woods Apartments (1982), Kane v. National Union Fire Insurance (2008)

25 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

3301981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Pepper v. Litton · Brown III v. Felsen · Castro v. United States · Hitt v. Nissan Motor Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the order is independent and easily separable from the substance of other claims in' the action; (2) the order presents a need to secure prompt review in order to protect important interests of any party; and (3) the order is examined in the light of practical, rather than narrowly technical, considerations.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Cohen was intended to cover just such a situation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[u]nder the principles enunciated in American Southern Insurance Co. v. Dime Taxi Service, Inc., ... a master is entitled to recover from his servant damages which the master has been required to pay by reason of the negligence of his servant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.