Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 638 F.2d 155 - Meyer v. United States

Meyer v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

638 F.2d 155 · 1980

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
7
states following
December 2012
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 3 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently December 2012

9 federal appellate · 3 district · 7 state decisions

1201980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act)

Relies on Hazelwood School District v. United States · Nicholas v. Davis · Faulstich v. Ladd · Frase v. Henry · United States v. Callahan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[e]vidence of the habit of a person or the routine practice of an organization ... is relevant to prove that the conduct of the person or the practice of the organization on a particular occasion was in conformity with the habit or routine practice”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[Habit evidence] does not stand in a special light nor is it to be referred to a second-class category which automatically carries little weight. If it is admissible, the weight to be given to it is dependent on the particular circumstances.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “would require us to substitute our judgment for that of the trial court”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.