Mangum v. Mitchell’s Empirical Analysis
638 F.2d 203 · 1980
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1382 (§ 1611 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1382C (§ 1614 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 416 (§ 216 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Dandridge v. Williams · Weinberger v. Salfi · Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. Murgia · Flemming v. Nestor · New York State Department of Social Services v. Dublino
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he statutory classification is rationally related to the achievement of the congressional purpose [of reducing fraud] and not subject to constitutional attack.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Munoz v. Sullivan“[t]he six-month rule was enacted 'to avoid encouraging couples to separate in order to receive the higher total benefits available to individuals.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Munoz v. Sullivan“equal protection and due process arguments are intertwined,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Munoz v. Sullivan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.