Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 638 F.2d 670 - Jefferson-Pilot Fire & Casualty Co. v. Boothe, Prichard & Dudley

Jefferson-Pilot Fire & Casualty Co. v. Boothe, Prichard & Dudley’s Empirical Analysis

638 F.2d 670 · 1980

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
4
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably Bank of California v. Opie (1981), Rossman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance (1987)

14 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions

1701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hiss v. Friedberg · Ayres v. Harleysville Mutual Casualty Co. · London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. C. B. White & Bros. · Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Obenshain · Lerner v. General Ins. Co. of America

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[O]n behalf of the insured [for] all sums which the insured shall become obligated to pay by reason of the liability imposed upon him by law for damages resulting from any claim made against the insured arising out of the performance of professional services for others in the insured’s capacity as a lawyer ... and caused by any act, error or omission of the insured or any other person for whose acts the insured is legally liable (emphasis supplied).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “First, where language in an insurance policy is susceptible of two constructions, it is to be construed liberally in favor of the insured and strictly against the insurer.... Second, where two interpretations equally fair may be made, the one which permits a greater indemnity will prevail.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “compelled to purchase legal and related services from attorneys not of their choosing at fees greater than those which could be obtained elsewhere and of a quality not best suited to their individual needs,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.