Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 638 F.2d 693 - Muhammad v. Rowe

Muhammad v. Rowe’s Empirical Analysis

638 F.2d 693 · 1981

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
January 1992
most recently cited

12 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Estelle v. Gamble · Haines v. Kerner · Houltin v. United States · Pomponio v. United States · Chapman v. Kleindienst

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[s]ince his application for appointment of counsel was denied, plaintiff is ‘entitled to an opportunity to offer proof’ unless ‘it appears “beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.” ’ Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520-21 [ 92 S.Ct. 594, 595, 596 , 30 L.Ed.2d 652 ] (1972). See also Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97 [ 97 S.Ct. 285 , 50 L.Ed.2d 251 ] (1976); Chapman v. Kleindienst, 507 F.2d 1246 , 1248-49 n.2 (7th Cir. 1974). Here, plaintiff was not only denied counsel, but also was not informed that he could answer documents filed in support of the defendants’ motion for summary judgment with his own documents, including affidavits.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Motion to Reconsider Order or in the Alternative, Motion for Leave to Take an Interlocutory Appeal In Forma Pauperis.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.