Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 638 F.3d 406 - Tri-M Group, LLC v. Sharp

Tri-M Group, LLC v. Sharp’s Empirical Analysis

638 F.3d 406 · 2011

Citation profile

103
cited by 103 later decisions
1
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1011 (§ 1 of the McCarran-Ferguson Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 29 U.S.C. § 151 (§ 1 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 50

Relies on United States v. Olano · Johnson v. Zerbst · Singleton v. Wulff · Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc. · Southern Pac Co v. State of Arizona Sullivan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 103 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is axiomatic that arguments asserted for the first time on appeal are deemed to be waived and consequently are not susceptible to review in this Court absent exceptional circumstances.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.