Reeves v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
638 F.3d 549 · 2011
Citation profile
10 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 523
Relies on Carini v. Matera · Ojeda v. Goldberg · United States Main v. Oakland City University · In Re: John W. Catt, Ii. Appeal Of: Shirley and Gerald Hash · In the Matter of John A. Maurice, Debtor-Appellant
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Whether the issue of intent was litigated and resolved in the state court action, as required for application of collateral estoppel, is [a] question of law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hebl v. Windeshausen“is subject to the highly deferential 'clearly erroneous' standard of review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hebl v. Windeshausen“[i]n the context of the entire [prior] court opinion”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Calvert
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.