Prebil v. Pinehurst, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently December 2012
1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1703 · 15 U.S.C. § 1709 (Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914)
Relies on Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United States · Ackmann v. Merchants Mortgage & Trust Corp. · 429 F. Supp. 313 - Bryan v. Amrep Corp. · Husted v. Amrep Corp. · Paquin v. Four Seasons of Tennessee, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(A) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; (B) to obtain money or property by means of any untrue statement of material fact, or any omission to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made (in light of the circumstances in which they were made and within the context of the overall offer and sale or lease) not misleading, with respect to any information pertinent to the lot or subdivision; (C) to engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon a purchaser; or (D) to represent that roads, sewers, water, gas, or electric service, or recreational amenities will be provided or completed by the developer without stipulating in the contract of sale or lease that such services or amenities will be provided or completed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“obtaining] money or property by means of any untrue statement of a material fact, or any omission to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made (in light of the circumstances in which they were made and within the context of the overall offer and sale or lease) not misleading, with respect to any information pertinent to the lot or subdivision....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“make use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce, or of the mails * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Allen v. NVR, Inc.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.