Holt v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 2008
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. McGill
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Court of Appeals relied on the consolidated case of State v. McGill, [ 622 N.E.2d 239 (Ind.Ct.App.1993) ], in upholding the trial court’s denial of Holt’s motion to dismiss. As in the present case, the two defendants in McGill were charged under § 9-30-10-17 for driving after their privileges had been forfeited for life under § 9-12-3-1. The trial court had dismissed the charges, but the Court of Appeals reversed, concluding that the uncodified savings clause in the 1991 enactment permitted prosecutions under § 9-30-10-17 based on convictions under the repealed statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Schenk v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.