Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 638 NE2D 822 - Al-Saud v. State

Al-Saud v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
December 1995
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · 182 Ind. App. 156 - Roddy v. State · J.L. v. State · Mahone v. State · Collins v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “While most batteries are preceded by the creation of a substantial risk of bodily injury, it is possible for a battery to be committed without first creating such a risk or engaging in the offense of recklessness under IC 3542-2-2(a). For example, a person may knowingly or intentionally touch another person by placing the barrel of an unloaded firearm against the body of another person, thus perpetrating a battery of the Class C felony type. However, such conduct does not necessarily create a substantial risk of bodily injury. Perhaps the use of an unloaded firearm in another manner may create such a risk, but the mere placement of the barrel against another person, while constituting a battery, does not necessarily constitute recklessness. Thus, recklessness is not an "inherently" included offense of battery.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “Whether a gun, loaded or unloaded, creates a substantial risk of bodily injury to another person is a question of fact to be decided only at the trial level-not on appeal. The Mahone illustration, admittedly dicta, was merely made to show that criminal recklessness was not inherently a lesser included offense of battery and had to be alleged by the State in its charging instrument. Reynolds and Warren should be overruled by the Indiana Supreme Court and Al-Saud's conviction should be affirmed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “A person who recklessly, knowingly, or intentionally performs: (1) an act that creates a substantial risk of bodily injury to another person ... commits criminal recklessness, a Class B misdemeanor. However, the offense is a: [[Image here]] (2) Class D felony if it is committed while armed with a deadly weapon.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.