Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 638 N.E.2d 861 - Crouch v. State

Crouch v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
April 2004
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Rideout v. United States · Parsley v. State · Bowman v. State · Van Allen v. State · Bowman v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “k * * * (2) Standards and regulations for the: (A) Selection; and (B) Certification; of breath test equipment and chemicals. (8) The certification of the proper technique for administering a breath test. * * * * * * (c) Certified copies of certificates issued in accordance with rules adopted under subsection (a).... * * * *# *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Our courts have consistently held that the necessary foundation for admissibility of a breath test requires proof that the approved methods have been followed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “to ensure the reliability. and accuracy of the results of the test.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.