Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 638 P2D 1109 - White v. Wint

White v. Wint’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently March 2025

11 state decisions

4019811990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on National Bank of Commerce v. Ripley · Walton, Mayor v. Donnelly · Rotramel v. Public Service Company · Board of Com'rs of Kingfisher County v. Grimes · Nucholls v. Board of Adjustment of City of Tulsa

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the statute contains an enumeration of specific words; (2) the members of the enumeration constitute a class; (3) the class is not exhausted by the enumeration; (4) a general reference supplementing the enumeration, usually following it; and (5) there is not clearly manifested an intent that the general term be given a broader meaning than the doctrine requires.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'the meaning of the general words will be ordinarily presumed to be restricted by the particular designation [of subjects or classes of persons enumerated in the statute] and to include only things or persons of the same kind, class, or nature as those specifically enumerated, unless ¶19 there is a clear manifestation of a contrary purpose.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.