Neves v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
2 district · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently March 2014
2 district · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on MacRae v. MacRae · 9 Utah 2d 244 - Barker v. Dunham · 1 Utah 2d 220 - Woodard v. Allen · 30 Utah 2d 47 - Corporation Nine v. Taylor · Grundmeyer v. McFadin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“avoid unfairness, sharp practice, [or] outright dishonesty.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“A defect which, by its nature cannot be removed by the seller as a practical matter is one `of such a nature that the vendor neither has title nor in a practical sense any prospect of acquiring it.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a seller may make a valid contract to sell property, though the seller has no legal title to the property, as long as the seller has title when the time to convey arrives.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ashworth v. Bullock
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.