Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 638 P2D 777 - Mau v. E.P.H. Corp.

Mau v. E.P.H. Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
September 2013
most recently cited

1 district · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently September 2013

1 district · 16 state decisions

701981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Relies on Goldberg v. Kelly · Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc. · Furtado v. Bishop · Furtado v. Bishop · Hartman v. Freedman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[alttorneys' fees allowable include those incurred in resolving the fee issue, Gurule v. Wilson [ 635 F.2d 782 (10th Cir.1980), abrogated by Cox v. Flood, 683 F.2d 330 (10th Cir.1982), and those incurred on appeal.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “If the fee requested is reasonable in light of community standards and the other criteria to be considered by the court, it is not appropriate for a court to take into consideration what a major client may pay the attorney on an hourly basis or the possible absence of overhead expenses comparable to those borne by lawyers in private practice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “based on the compensatory purpose of fee-shifting. Addressing an action by tenants for wrongful withholding of their security deposit, the supreme court ordered an attorney fee determination, stating that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.