Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 638 SE2D 513 - In Re ME

In Re ME’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 2008
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1738A

Relies on Matter of Moore · Owenby v. Young · Estelle v. Bullard · 88 N.C. App. 550 - Matter of Arends · Hoyle v. Isenhour Brick & Tile Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(b) Before determining whether it is an inconvenient forum, a court of this State shall consider whether it is appropriate for a court of another state to exercise jurisdiction. For this purpose, the court shall allow the parties to submit information and shall consider all relevant factors, including: (1) Whether domestic violence has occurred and is likely to continue in the future and which state could best protect the parties and the child; (2) The length of time the child has resided outside this State; (3) The distance between the court in this State and the court in the state that would assume jurisdiction; (4) The relative financial circumstances of the parties; (5) Any agreement of the parties as to which state should assume jurisdiction; (6) The nature and location of the evidence required to resolve the pending litigation, including testimony of the child; (7) The ability of the court of each state to decide the issue expeditiously and the procedures necessary to present the evidence; and (8) The familiarity of the court of each state with the facts and issues in the pending litigation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “may decline to exercise its jurisdiction at any time if it determines that it is an inconvenient forum under the circumstances, and that a court of another state is a more appropriate forum.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “whether the trial court abused its discretion in finding and concluding that North Carolina was an inconvenient forum.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.