Cooper v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 21, 1994

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1994-06-21

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently May 2006

2 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“no deficiency in the standard Miranda rights form utilized by the Metro-Dade Police Department.”

quoted by 1 later decision, including 750 So. 2d 22 - Johnson v. State

Relies on 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio · California v. Prysock

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1994-06-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1No reversible error has been demonstrated in the trial proceedings which culminated *201in the convictions entered below. Specifically, we find no deficiency in the standard Miranda rights form utilized by the Metro-Dade Police Department, see California v. Prysock, 453 U.S. 355, 101 S.Ct. 2806, 69 L.Ed.2d 696 (1981), and that, in the light of the overwhelming evidence of guilt, any arguable error in the admission of evidence or the argument of the prosecutor was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986). We do agree that the formal judgments entered against the defendants should be corrected to reflect that the charges contained in count V were dismissed on motion of the state.

¶2Affirmed as modified.