638 So. 2d 581 - Echols v. Elswick’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 382 So. 2d 1197 - Canakaris v. Canakaris · 635 So. 2d 1021 - Shiveley v. Shiveley · 514 So. 2d 372 - Simzer v. Simzer · 382 So. 2d 733 - Volosin v. Volosin · 547 So. 2d 1247 - Driscoll v. Driscoll
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[R]ehabilitative alimony may not be awarded where there is no evidence that the recipient is seeking to redevelop previous job skills or train for new ones.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Green v. Green
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.