Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 638 So. 2d 586 - Cox v. Cox

638 So. 2d 586 - Cox v. Cox’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
August 1995
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 382 So. 2d 1197 - Canakaris v. Canakaris · 491 So. 2d 265 - Diffenderfer v. Diffenderfer · Casto v. Casto · Weeks v. Weeks · Miller v. West Palm Beach Atlantic National Bank

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]t appears to be well settled that reconciliation of husband and wife and resumption of marital relations for any period of time will render a previous contract and settlement of property rights void.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “DOES RECONCILIATION OR REMARRIAGE VOID A PROPERTY SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT OR SEPARATION AGREEMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.