Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 638 SW2D 249 - Porter v. State

Porter v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 1984
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Broadrick v. Oklahoma · Connally v. General Construction Co. · Leary v. United States · Dombrowski v. Eastland · Smith v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(e) A person who promotes or wholesale promotes obscene material or an obscene device or possesses the same with intent to promote or wholesale promote it in the course of his business is presumed to do so with knowledge of its content and character. (f) A person who possesses six or more obscene devices or identical or similar obscene articles is presumed to possess them with intent to promote the same.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.