Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 638 SW2D 608 - Sauve v. State

Sauve v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
January 2000
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently January 2000

7 state decisions

40198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 204th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Grayless v. State · PG v. State · Matter of WLC · TPS v. State · Johnson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Ordinarily, an officer’s return which is valid on its face carries a presumption of the truth of the facts stated on the return and of regularity. A defendant may rebut this presumption, but his testimony alone is insufficient; instead, he must offer other corroborating facts and circumstances to rebut the presumption.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Although a juvenile may not waive service of process, he may waive the right to complain of whether a formal order need be entered by the juvenile judge finding the service suitable and directing service, both of which matters go to form rather than substance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “(c) Service of the summons may be made by any suitable person under the direction of the court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.