Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 638 SW2D 804 - State v. Hinkle

State v. Hinkle’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
December 2016
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently December 2016

6 state decisions

201982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Puckett · People v. Szymczak

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A person commits the crime of felonious restraint if he knowingly restrains another unlawfully and without consent so as to interfere substantially with his liberty and exposes him to a substantial risk of serious physical injury. § 565.120.1, RSMo 1986.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.