McDaniel v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis
639 F.2d 1386 · 1981
Citation profile
21
cited by 21 later decisions
April 1999
most recently cited
14 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Consolidated Edison Co of New York v. National Labor Relations Board · DePaepe v. Richardson · Epps v. Harris · Rivas v. Weinberger
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“work which exists in the national economy”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Based on the absence of any evidence that McDaniel is not physically disabled — or that there is substantial gainful work existing in the national economy — , we find that the Secretary’s decision is not supported by substantial evidence. We remand the case to the district court so that it may issue an appropriate order directing the Secretary to grant the appellant the disability benefits to which he is entitled in accordance with this opinion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Olson v. Schweiker
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.