Holmes v. Sopuch’s Empirical Analysis
639 F.2d 431 · 1981
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently June 2015 · most notably Prakash v. American University (1984), Lew v. Moss (1986)
17 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Margaret Williamson v. Katherine Osenton · A. Gusmer, Inc. v. McGranery · Janzen v. Goos · Russell v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. · Spurgeon v. Mission State Bank
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1. physical presence at the new location; and 2. an intention to remain there indefinitely, or the absence of any intention to go elsewhere.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Ring
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.