Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 639 F.2d 559 - Ramos v. Lamm

Ramos v. Lamm’s Empirical Analysis

639 F.2d 559 · 1980

Citation profile

663
cited by 663 later decisions
6
cited 6 times by the Supreme Court
19
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

278 federal appellate · 90 district · 31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 663 later decisions (6 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2025 · most notably Farmer v. Brennan (1994), Wilson v. Seiter (1991)

278 federal appellate · 90 district · 31 state decisions — followed in 19 states

247019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Estelle v. Gamble · Younger v. Harris · Bell v. Wolfish · Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 663 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A medical need is serious if it is 'one that has been diagnosed by a physician as mandating treatment or one that is so obvious that even a lay person would easily recognize the necessity for a doctor's attention.'”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “proving there are such systemic and gross deficiencies in staffing, facilities, equipment, or procedures that the inmate population is effectively denied access to adequate medical care.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “deliberate indifference to serious medical needs of prisoners”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.