Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 639 F.2d 795 - Holly v. Chasen

Holly v. Chasen’s Empirical Analysis

639 F.2d 795 · 1981

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
March 1999
most recently cited

15 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Testan · United States v. Sherwood · United States v. N. Y. Rayon Importing Co. · United States v. Thayer-West Point Hotel Co. · United States v. Alcea Band

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1961 is read to confer an automatic entitlement to interest at the rate provided by state law on all civil judgments against the United States, these very detailed statutory provisions will all become superfluous.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “it must be express, and it must be strictly construed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.