¶1David Boies, Rosanne C. Baxter, Esquire, Counsel, Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP, Armonk, NY, Jeremy Michael Goldman, Esquire, Boies, Schiller & Flexner, LLP, Oakland, CA, Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr., Esquire, Christopher D. Dusseault, Theane Evangelis Kapur, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Ethan Douglas Dettmer, Esquire, Enrique Antonio Monagas, Sarah E. Piepmeier, Esquire, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, San Francisco, CA, Theodore Olson, Matthew McGill, Amir C. Tayrani, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, LLP, Washington, DC, Theodore H. Uno, Bois Schiller & Flexner LLP, Hollywood, FL, Joshua Irwin Schiller, Richard Jason Bettan, Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP, New York, NY, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.
¶2Vince Chhabria, Esquire, Dennis J. Herrera, City, Office of The City Attorney, Ronald P. Flynn, Therese Stewart, Chief Deputy City, Christine Van Aken, Deputy City, Erin Bernstein, Deputy City, Mollie Mindes Lee, Deputy City, San Francisco City Attorney’s Office, Danny Chou, San Francisco, CA, for Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee.
¶3Tamar Pachter, Deputy Attorney General, Daniel Powell, Deputy Attorney General, California Department of Justice, San Francisco, CA, Kenneth C. Mennemeier, Jr., Mennemeier, Glassman & Stroud LLP, Sacramento, CA, Claude Franklin Kolm, Esquire, Oakland, CA, Judy W. Whitehurst, Principal Deputy County Counsel, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants.
¶4Jesse Panuccio, David Thompson, Charles J. Cooper, Nicole Jo Moss, Peter A. Patterson, Cooper & Kirk, PLLC, Washington, DC, Andrew P. Pugno, Law Offices of Andrew P. Pugno, Folsom, CA, James Andrew Campbell, Litigation Staff Counsel, Brian William Raum, Senior Counsel, Alliance Defense Fund, Scottsdale, AZ, Terry L. Thompson, Law Office of Terry L. Thompson, Alamo, CA, for Intervenor-Defendants-Appellants.
¶5Before: REINHARDT, HAWKINS, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
¶7Having considered all of the factors set forth in Nken v. Holder, - U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 1749, 1756, 173 L.Ed.2d 550 (2009), and all of the facts and circumstances surrounding Plaintiffs’ motion to vacate the stay pending appeal, as well as the standard for vacatur set forth in Southeast Alaska Conservation Council v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 472 F.3d 1097, 1101 (9th Cir.2006), we deny Plaintiffs’ motion at this time.