Schmidt v. Creedon’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[E]very court of appeals which has addressed the issue has ruled that a person has no constitutionally protected liberty or property interest in a security clearance or a job requiring security clearance.”). 9 . Companiony also contends that her pre-ter-mination proceedings were insufficient because Appellees participated in bad faith in that they did not ask her questions. This argument is meritless: where, as here, adequate post-deprivation procedures are available, an employee is not entitled to a pre-termination proceeding before a neutral decisionmaker, but only an”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Isabel Cristina Companiony v. Murphy

2. “First, the private interest that will be affected by the official action; second, the risk of an erroneous deprivation of such interest through the procedures used, and the probable value, if any, of additional or substitute procedural safeguards; and finally, the Government’s interest, including the function involved and the fiscal and administrative burdens that the additional or substitute procedural requirement would entail.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 540 F. App'x 118 - Pioneer Aggregates, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection

3. “5. “[Wjhether the plaintiff has a property interest protected by procedural due process, and” 6. “[W]hat procedures constitute due process of law.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 947 F. Supp. 2d 509 - Gorman v. Bail