State v. Shuman’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
August 2015
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Oregon v. Mathiason · Ashdown v. Utah · 5 Utah 2d 59 - State v. Ashdown · 73 Wash. 2d 634 - State v. Bower
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“he had not been placed under arrest or given any indication that he would have been compelled to go [with the police] if he had resisted or been restrained from leaving if he had desired.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Heywood“That defendant was not in custody at his own apartment ... is obvious from the fact that the officers leftrhim there unrestrained when they departed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Heywood“Since Mirando warnings are required only where a person has been taken into custody or otherwise deprived of his freedom in a significant way,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Heywood
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.