Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 639 SE2D 122 - In Re LTR

In Re LTR’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on GLK, Inc. v. United States · In re Disbarment of Alexander · Concrete Service Corp. v. Investors Group, Inc. · Concrete Service Corp. v. Investors Group, Inc. · 156 N.C. App. 644 - In Re Padgett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “are conclusive on appeal when supported by any competent evidence, even if the evidence could sustain contrary findings.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Under the liberal standard of notice pleading, a claim is adequate if it gives sufficient notice of the events that produced the claim to enable the adverse party to understand the complaint's nature and basis and to file a responsive pleading. In re L.T.R. & J.M.R. , 181 N.C. App. 376 , 389, 639 S.E.2d 122 , 130 (2007) (citations omitted). The neglect petitions in this case alleged that the children were neglected because they”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[a] short and plain statement of the claim sufficiently particular to give the court and the parties notice of the transactions, occurrences, or series of transactions or occurrences, intended to be proved showing that the pleader is entitled to relief[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.