Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 639 SE2D 323 - In Re Cm

In Re Cm’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
February 2012
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In the Interest of M. L. P. · 232 Ga. App. 330 - In the Interest of A. H. P. · In the Interest of J. K. · 236 Ga. App. 504 - In Re Mlp · 237 Ga. App. 900 - Department of Transportation v. Mendel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]f, upon the entering of an order terminating the parental rights of a parent, there is no parent having parental rights, the court shall first attempt to place the child with a person related to the child by blood or marriage or with a member of the child's extended family if such a person is willing and, after study by the probation officer or other person or agency designated by the court, is found by the court to be qualified to receive and care for the child, if the court determines such placement is the most appropriate for and in the best interest of the child.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “OCGA § 15-11-103(a)(1) does not require a trial court to give preference to family members in making a placement of a child following termination of parental rights. Rather, the statute states that a placement shall be made "if the court determines such placement is the most appropriate for and in the best interest of the child." A trial court's determination that placement with a relative is not in the best interest of the child will not be disturbed by this Court absent an abuse of discretion. [7]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. In Re Aa
  3. “`In determining whether the conditions of deprivation are likely to continue, the juvenile court may consider the past conduct of the parent in ascertaining future conduct.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. In Re Hm

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.