Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

639 So. 2d 1019

Wilson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1994-07-01

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 1995

1 state decisions

Relies on Green v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1994-07-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

HARRIS, Chief Judge.

¶1Wilson appeals the denial of his 3.800 motion seeking additional credit against his sentence. His pleadings, filed in proper person, are not a model of clarity. It appears, however, that he contends that the judgment does not award him credit for all of his time served in prison between the first and second sentence.1

¶2The trial judge awarded credit as follows:

292 days at the county jail plus all State prison time prior to resentencing.

¶3Since Wilson has not indicated that he spent more time in jail than that allowed by the judge, he appears to be arguing that the trial judge must determine and state the specific amount of prison credit earned. We disagree and affirm.

¶4The court has delegated to the Department of Corrections the task of determining the proper amount of prison credit earned by Wilson and then credit him with it. This is appropriate. Green v. State, 636 So.2d 830 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).

¶5AFFIRMED.

PETERSON, J., concurs..DAUKSCH, J., dissents, without opinion.

¶6. The second sentence was required because the first sentence was set aside on appeal.

/639/so2d/1019 · .json · Public domain